Thursday, June 28, 2012

Supreme Court and Health Care for All - statement from Senator Sanders

Statement on Supreme Court Health Care Ruling


June 28, 2012
WASHINGTON, DC
 

Congressional Senator from Vermont. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement today after the Supreme Court upheld  the Affordable Care Act: 

"Today is a good day for millions of Americans who have pre-existing conditions who can no longer be rejected by insurance companies.  It is a good day for families with children under 26 who can keep their children on their health insurance policies.  It is a good day for women who can no longer be charged far higher premiums than men.
"It is a good day for 30 million uninsured Americans who will have access to healthcare.  It is a good day for seniors who will continue to see their prescription drug costs go down as the so-called doughnut hole goes away. It is a good day for small businesses who simply cannot continue to afford the escalating costs of providing insurance for their employees. It is a good day for 20 million Americans who will soon be able to find access to community health centers.
 

"It is an especially good day for the state of Vermont, which stands to receive hundreds of millions of dollars in additional federal funds to help our state achieve universal health care.
"In my view, while the Affordable Care Act is an important step in the right direction and I am glad that the Supreme Court upheld it, we ultimately need to do better.  If we are serious about providing high-quality, affordable healthcare as a right, not a privilege, the real solution to America's health care crisis is a Medicare-for-all, single-payer system. Until then, we will remain the only major nation that does not provide health care for every man, woman and child as a right of citizenship.
"I am proud that Vermont is making steady progress toward implementing a single-payer system. I hope our state will be a model to show the rest of the nation how to provide better care at less cost to more people."

Thursday, June 21, 2012

The United Nations, Rhode Island, and a Homeless Bill of Rghts


Linda's Hearth note: 

Another Week's News About "Homeless" Politics  



"ICH/US report on criminalizing homlessness" is important information that followed the conclusion of Gary Johnson's Lodging 647(e) three-judge appeals court. 


Those judges did not find for Gary, rather they supported Honorable Judge Gallagher's  decisions a week ago today in Superior Court dept 5, including his definition of Lodging for California's legal purposes. Johnson has already served jail time for this "crime" of sleep during a protest, as had his attorney, Ed Frey. And the terms of probation offered Gary would have left him forbidden from sleeping anywhere in the city or county (or state?) at nighttime because of the "obey all laws" catch-all those deals always close with. 


Go to jail for being a sleep criminal? Or go to jail for attempting to question terms of probation for clarification about his punishment for being a sleep criminal? Some things are just too absurd to take seriously, unless the noose has YOUR name on it.


I do not agree with the 2 appeals judges (other one was M I A):  I feel that when such a casual and naive definition of this unconstitutional law has the effect -- just as the Sheriff's Deputies had on that crucial predawn PeaceCamp2010 morning, when they cited and arrested our 24/7 First Amendment demonstration to sweep the courthouse steps --has the effect of depriving citizens of their liberty or livelihood or, contended Gary's atttorey, one's life, which requires sleep. 


But hey, I am not an attorney, and lately at times I'm sorry I ever stayed awake in civics class in eleventh grade, in Poolesville, MD. 

The following is by Gary Johnson, and following Gary's comments and urls; courtwatch details 

from Robert Norse/Indybay Santa Cruz; followed by Reuters. I'm not sure who gets credit for the yellow hilighting, but thanks, to whomever!   --Linda's Hearth about Lodging 647(e), California

# # # #


Rhode Island Passes homeless bill of rights; 

Santa Cruz Upholds Six Month Jail Sentences 

for Sleep-Protest)‏


I forgot to mention the recent US report, praised by the UN (it'll come up on http://peacecamp2010insider.blogspot.com/ sometime soon).


"The report condemns the criminalization of the homeless through various acts of living, such as sleeping or conducting personal hygiene measures in public spaces and suggests alternatives to reduce homelessness and implement preventative measures."

http://www.usich.gov/resources/uploads/asset_library/RPT_SoS_March2012.pdf

http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/04/criminalization-of-the-homeless-may-violate-human-rights.php

-- 
G



 
Friday, June 15, 2012 9:01 AM                                                                                                     Rhode Island Passes homeless bill of rights; Santa Cruz Upholds Six Month Jail Sentences for Sleep-Protest

The Rhode Island press release:

http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/news/pr1.asp?prid=8447

The text of the RISenate bill.

http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText12/SenateText12/S2052B.pdf

The text of the RIHouse bill.

http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText12/HouseText12/H7173A.pdf

-- 
G



NOTE:  While Rhode Island is moving into the 21st Century, Santa Cruz is moving back into the 19th.   

Yesterday a two judge panel (Judges Volkman and Marigonda) ignored constitutional arguments and upheld six month jail sentences for homeless activist Gary Johnson and attorney Ed Frey, for sleeping with signs outside the Courts in August of 2010 as part of the PeaceCamp2010 protests against the City's "no sleep for the homeless" laws.   

Seehttp://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2012/06/05/18714834.php?show_comments=1#18715462 
Activist "Lighthouse" Linda Lemaster also faces six months in jail for being at that protest under the new "drive away protest" use of the state anti-lodging law PC 647e.    See http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2012/06/11/18715182.php 

Rhode Island setting the model for the rest of America


Rhode Island passes bill to guarantee rights of homeless people

June 13, 2012|Jason McLure | Reuters
 
 
(Reuters) - Rhode Island's governor is expected to sign into law the first "Homeless Bill of Rights" in the United States as early as next week, formally banning discrimination against homeless people and affirming their equal access to jobs, housing and services.
 
The legislation, which won final approval by the state Senate on Wednesday, bucks a national trend among municipalities toward outlawing behaviors associated with homelessness such as eating, sleeping and panhandling in public spaces.
Among other steps, the Rhode Island law would guarantee homeless people the right to use public sidewalks, parks and transportation as well as public buildings, like anyone else "without discrimination on the basis of his or her housing status."
It guarantees a "reasonable expectation of privacy" with respect to personal belongings similar to that of people who have homes.
While other laws already guarantee many of the rights specified in this legislation, supporters say it was necessary due to widespread discrimination.
"I think we've set the bar high in the U.S. for homeless people, and I'm very proud of that," said Senator John Tassoni, a sponsor of the bill.
Rhode Island is the smallest of the 50 U.S. states.
Tassoni and other homeless advocates said Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee would likely sign the bill in coming days. Chafee's office said it could not comment until the bill was formally presented to the governor for signing.
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS ARE HOMELESS
Roughly 643,000 people are homeless on any given night in the United States, experts say.
"It's important as a standalone piece of legislation but also as it's juxtaposed with other communities that are in the process of criminalizing homelessness," said Neil Donovan, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless.
"This just affirms the rights and existence of the unhoused in America."
Cities including Philadelphia, San Francisco and St. Louis recently passed ordinances targeting the homeless or have stepped up enforcement of existing regulations.
A report in April from the White House's Interagency Council on Homelessness noted a "proliferation of local measures to criminalize acts of living'" such as sitting, standing or asking for money in public places.
"You're just looked down on because you're carrying your life on your back," said John Joyce of Providence, who was homeless for three years and now is co-director of the Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project.
Frank Nolan, 53, of Providence became homeless last year when a ruptured appendix left him with $30,000 in hospital bills and he did not have medical insurance.
Nolan said he used the addresses of friends on job applications because he knew he would not be hired if his address was a homeless shelter.
 
He said he was stunned when a bus driver failed to stop for him and three other homeless men waiting near a shelter. "He pulled up and looked at us and he knew we were homeless," said Nolan. He just waved and he drove off."
In Philadelphia, an ordinance took effect on June 1 banning charities from feeding homeless people in public places such as parks.
In St. Louis, Missouri, police evicted homeless people from a site leased for them by a local minister after the city cleared out three homeless encampments along the Mississippi River.
In California, San Francisco last year began enforcing a ban on sitting and lying on sidewalks between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., with violators facing tickets of up to $500. But San Jose recently said it would order police to stop throwing away the personal possessions of homeless people seized during sweeps of homeless camps, amid criticism from homeless advocates.
 
Opposition to the bill in Rhode Island's Democratic-controlled legislature was muted, said Jim Ryczek, executive director of the Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless.
(Reporting by Jason McLure in Littleton, New Hampshire. Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Christopher Wilson)
 

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

154 suicides for active-duty troops in 2012 – nearly one per day of the year so far




MORE SOLDIERS DIE FROM SUICIDE THAN COMBAT
-from facebook page, Truth Becons
posted June 10, 2012

Another extremely sad revelation following a decade of war – new Pentagon statistics are showing that the military is losing an average of one soldier per day not to combat in Afghanistan, but to suicide.

As of this writing, according to an Associated Press investigation, there have been 154 suicides for active-duty troops in 2012 – nearly one per day of the year so far.

Besides a surging suicide rate, the military is also experiencing higher incidences of sexual assault, domestic violence, alcohol and drug abuse and other forms of misbehavior.

Analysts say these figures are reflective of an over-burdened military that is reeling from multiple deployments over the past 10 years, mostly to Iraq and Afghanistan. It should be noted that these wartime deployments come in addition to peacetime obligations such as year-long, recurring commitments to places like Qatar, Sinai Peninsula, Egypt, Kosovo and parts of Africa – assignments that are often handled by National Guard units from around the country because they are in excess of the staffing and manning capabilities of active duty components.

Needless to say, the American military is busy — some say too busy. Still, military suicide rates had been leveling off; they fell in 2010 and 2011. So the increase now was not only unexpected but difficult to explain.

Or is it?

Multiple wars, multiple deployments = higher rates of suicide

Some believe the spike is simply the result of the military’s sustained, hectic optempo (operations tempo). At the peak of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, many active duty forces – especially the Army and Marine Corps – were pulling new deployments every year or so. By 2009, some long-term servicemembers on active duty had been deployed as many as four times.

The optempo hasn’t been much better for Guard and Reserve units, of which many members have been deployed nearly as often as their active duty counterparts (though that is not the norm; National Guard units typically spend at least 4-5 years back home in their respective states between deployments).

Such a high deployment rate, then, leads to other conclusions: too much combat exposure and an increase in post-traumatic stress, which has then led to “misuse of prescription medications and personal financial problems,” the AP reported.

“Army data suggest soldiers with multiple combat tours are at greater risk of committing suicide, although a substantial proportion of Army suicides are committed by soldiers who never deployed,” said the report.

Whatever the reason or combination of reasons, clearly Pentagon leaders have a problem on their hands. According to Defense Department’s own figures, the 154 suicides this year compare to 130 over the same period last year, an increase of 18 percent. Additionally, that is more than the average of about 136 suicides the Pentagon had earlier projected for the current period based on trends from 2001-2011.

“This year’s January-May total is up 25 percent from two years ago, and it is 16 percent ahead of the pace for 2009, which ended with the highest yearly total thus far,” AP reported.

Part of the problem is cultural. Military members – especially those in combat arms units – often ignore warning signs and eschew profession help because they believe it’s a sign of weakness and an impediment to rank advancement.

And yet, ignoring the signs and turning down help has very real consequences. Few know that better than Kim Ruocco, widow of Marine Maj. John Ruocco, a helicopter pilot who hanged himself in 2005 between Iraq deployments. He said he couldn’t bring himself to go for help.

Stigma of weakness is killing our troops

“He was so afraid of how people would view him once he went for help,” she told the AP at her home in suburban Boston. “He thought that people would think he was weak, that people would think he was just trying to get out of redeploying or trying to get out of service, or that he just couldn’t hack it – when, in reality, he was sick. He had suffered injury in combat and he had also suffered from depression and let it go untreated for years. And because of that, he’s dead today.”

As a result of her husband’s horribly untimely death, Ruocco joined TAPS – Tragedy Assistance Programs – a military support organization. She is currently its director of suicide prevention programs; she organized the group’s first program focusing on providing support for families of suicide victims.

The military is aware it has a problem and, for its part, is responding. The Marines have implemented a number of programs and the service has probably been the most successful in lowering suicide rates. But more needs to be done, especially to eliminate the stigma associated with asking for help.

“What is known is that all Army populations … are under increased stress after a decade of war,” said an Army report earlier this year, adding that if not for prevention efforts the Army’s suicide totals could be perhaps four times higher than they are already.

And here’s another perspective. Some think war is the country’s new economic policy. (http://www.marketwatch.com/) Sad if true.

Sources for this article include:

http://hosted.ap.org/

http://reason.com/